In 2006 when in opposition David Cameron said : “Bombs and missiles are bad ambassadors. They can build no democracies.” So why was he so desperate to attack Syria? You would think that David Cameron would be against British involvement in Syria, as he spends so much time talking about Britain's deficit. The answer to why David Cameron wants involvement for British troops is simple, that is what the puppet masters wish to do, the lobbyists, the bankers and the oil companies. David Cameron has the job of trying to sell the war to the British public unfortunately for him the British public is waking up! After the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya ALL proved to be morally wrong and more like imperialist wars than a war on terror, the British people have finally spoke out and won, leaving David Cameron looking like a desperate weak man.
David Cameron did not take the defeat well as Labour sources say David Cameron accused Ed Miliband of 'letting down America' and 'siding with Lavrov' in an angry row before the Syria intervention vote in the House of Commons. In all fairness to David Cameron there are only so many shit products a salesman can sell before the people buying the shit wake up and realize its shit and so far David Cameron has sold the British people a war in Libya, benefit cuts for the sick, disabled and poor, cuts to public services, a rise in VAT, tax cuts for the rich, Workfare and many other stupid ideas and schemes, no wonder the British people are not buying this shit. David Cameron is a good salesman but he sells nothing but shit.
Former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown described the result as "bad for Britain" and claims "Putin and Assad will be celebrating" he also said he is depressed and ashamed that he will now have to wake up and watch children burning on his television, Paddy Ashdown and the government are as usual completely missing the point on this, people are getting sick of wars for profit, lies and hypocrisy, some reports claim that over 1000 people could be dead due to chemical attacks by the Syrian government, although there is uncertainty on who carried out the attacks and even if it was the government that are responsible for the attacks missiles, bombs and guns are only going to kill more people and make things worse. Our government are telling us we can not afford to pay benefits to the sick and disabled and the NHS is to expensive to run, good news for David Cameron, Britain not getting involved in this war will save us millions/billions that can now be spent on looking after the sick and disabled who are suffering as a result of David Cameron's so called war on benefit scroungers.
Looks like David Cameron, George Osborne and the rest of the Tory party will have to make do with murdering Badgers for now.
Friday, 30 August 2013
Wednesday, 28 August 2013
DO YOU SEE WHAT I SEE?
We in Great Britain often boast about our country being tolerant and free, a country with equality and freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and equal rights for all, I disagree with this hypothesis.
When I look at Britain I fail to see what the masses see, instead I see a nation of conformists, I see a nation of sad drunks and drug addicts sitting in front of the TV drinking and working and drinking their lives away. I see a nation obsessed with over priced gadgets, football and reality TV, unfortunately reality TV is the only reality they are interested in. I see a nation that our masses stand by and watch as our sick government cut benefits for the sick, disabled and the poor, a nation that believes that people that do not take part in the system should not even to be allowed to eat. I see a nation that watches as our government destroy Iraq, Libya and next Syria, and we then have the nerve to call Muslims terrorists. A nation where the PRIME MINISTER is a known arms dealer and our monarchy have a history of oppression, slavery and war, yet we still worship them. I see a nation that claims to care for children, yet we stand by and watch as corporations like Tesco and Next exploit some of the poorest children in the world, with child labour and slavery, facts like this will not stop the masses from shopping at these sickening companies. I see corruption in the banks, the government, police and the media, I see a nation that is governed by money our politicians are puppets to the banks and corporations.
Poor people are punished and sometimes locked up for minor offences like possession of Cannabis, shop lifting, and not paying taxes when MPs over claim millions and bankers receive huge bonuses despite the banks being bailed out, MPs and bankers are obviously above the law in fact they are the law. The lifestyles of the western world has a negative impact on the lifestyles of many people around the world, but we don't care, we are to busy watching X factor.
When I look at Britain I fail to see what the masses see, instead I see a nation of conformists, I see a nation of sad drunks and drug addicts sitting in front of the TV drinking and working and drinking their lives away. I see a nation obsessed with over priced gadgets, football and reality TV, unfortunately reality TV is the only reality they are interested in. I see a nation that our masses stand by and watch as our sick government cut benefits for the sick, disabled and the poor, a nation that believes that people that do not take part in the system should not even to be allowed to eat. I see a nation that watches as our government destroy Iraq, Libya and next Syria, and we then have the nerve to call Muslims terrorists. A nation where the PRIME MINISTER is a known arms dealer and our monarchy have a history of oppression, slavery and war, yet we still worship them. I see a nation that claims to care for children, yet we stand by and watch as corporations like Tesco and Next exploit some of the poorest children in the world, with child labour and slavery, facts like this will not stop the masses from shopping at these sickening companies. I see corruption in the banks, the government, police and the media, I see a nation that is governed by money our politicians are puppets to the banks and corporations.
Poor people are punished and sometimes locked up for minor offences like possession of Cannabis, shop lifting, and not paying taxes when MPs over claim millions and bankers receive huge bonuses despite the banks being bailed out, MPs and bankers are obviously above the law in fact they are the law. The lifestyles of the western world has a negative impact on the lifestyles of many people around the world, but we don't care, we are to busy watching X factor.
FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN RIP OFF.
Are you having trouble with your banks? Have your bank unfairly charged you for unauthorized overdrafts or missed direct debit payments, leaving you with no money for electric, gas or even food for your kids? or have your bank gone into your account and illegally taken a large sum of money from your bank account? Lloyds TSB have taken over £80000 from one account, after a retiring (from business) couple sold 1 of their 2 houses! Never fear we are protected, by the Financial Ombudsman, the banks must be shitting their selves!
Back in about 2009, after my girlfriends bank illegally taken money from her bank account (over £3500 in a 5 year span, sometimes taking as much as £140 per day and other occasions £200 per week) I contacted the Financial Ombudsman, and explained the situation, i was confident that I was going to get the money back after all the charges were undeniably ridiculous especially when you think she was a single mother with 2 children at the time and on benefits, they had left her with no money for gas and electric at times so when I speaking to the Financial Ombudsman service they agreed the charges were ridiculous and illegal and they were also confident that she would have it back.
The Financial Ombudsman told us to get a copy of all our bank statements over the last 5 years and highlight all the charges and post the statements with the overdraft and missed direct debit charges on them, they added up to £3500, we waited over a month to receive the bank statements from Nationwide Building Society, I posted the statements to the Financial Ombudsman, i waited over a month for a reply, i than get a letter telling me they have warned Nationwide Building Society about these charges and I should hear something from them soon.
Three weeks later we get a letter from the Nationwide Building Society offering us £400, we rejected the offer and called the Financial Ombudsman again, “take it” they said “we can get the rest later” so we take the £400, mean while the corrupt blatantly paid off supreme court over turned earlier court rulings that would have allowed the Office of fair trading to investigate bank charges, effectively legalizing bank charges of up to £300 per week, the Office of fair trading said they will fight on but there as been no sign of any change yet.
After the ruling, the Financial Ombudsman still insisted on we could still get it back, I had just lost my job, we were falling behind on rent and the Ombudsman said we could claim financial hardship, a few weeks later we get a letter back from the bank refusing to pay out, I inform the Ombudsman and he informs me there is nothing else they can do because of the change in law! So after months of long phone calls, massive phone bills, waiting on hold to speak to both the Financial Ombudsman service and Nationwide Building Society, posting letters, waiting for replies I got back £400 from the £3500 they had illegally taken over the years and I should not be surprised, after all who funds the Financial Ombudsman service? the answer is of coarse the banks! the Financial Ombudsman service WORK FOR THE BANKS NOT FOR THE PEOPLE, they make everything as slow possible and in my experience the Financial Ombudsman service seem to be completely powerless and absolutely useless at doing there jobs, that is unless their job is to waste your time in that case 5 stars for the Financial Ombudsman service, well done lads.
Back in about 2009, after my girlfriends bank illegally taken money from her bank account (over £3500 in a 5 year span, sometimes taking as much as £140 per day and other occasions £200 per week) I contacted the Financial Ombudsman, and explained the situation, i was confident that I was going to get the money back after all the charges were undeniably ridiculous especially when you think she was a single mother with 2 children at the time and on benefits, they had left her with no money for gas and electric at times so when I speaking to the Financial Ombudsman service they agreed the charges were ridiculous and illegal and they were also confident that she would have it back.
The Financial Ombudsman told us to get a copy of all our bank statements over the last 5 years and highlight all the charges and post the statements with the overdraft and missed direct debit charges on them, they added up to £3500, we waited over a month to receive the bank statements from Nationwide Building Society, I posted the statements to the Financial Ombudsman, i waited over a month for a reply, i than get a letter telling me they have warned Nationwide Building Society about these charges and I should hear something from them soon.
Three weeks later we get a letter from the Nationwide Building Society offering us £400, we rejected the offer and called the Financial Ombudsman again, “take it” they said “we can get the rest later” so we take the £400, mean while the corrupt blatantly paid off supreme court over turned earlier court rulings that would have allowed the Office of fair trading to investigate bank charges, effectively legalizing bank charges of up to £300 per week, the Office of fair trading said they will fight on but there as been no sign of any change yet.
After the ruling, the Financial Ombudsman still insisted on we could still get it back, I had just lost my job, we were falling behind on rent and the Ombudsman said we could claim financial hardship, a few weeks later we get a letter back from the bank refusing to pay out, I inform the Ombudsman and he informs me there is nothing else they can do because of the change in law! So after months of long phone calls, massive phone bills, waiting on hold to speak to both the Financial Ombudsman service and Nationwide Building Society, posting letters, waiting for replies I got back £400 from the £3500 they had illegally taken over the years and I should not be surprised, after all who funds the Financial Ombudsman service? the answer is of coarse the banks! the Financial Ombudsman service WORK FOR THE BANKS NOT FOR THE PEOPLE, they make everything as slow possible and in my experience the Financial Ombudsman service seem to be completely powerless and absolutely useless at doing there jobs, that is unless their job is to waste your time in that case 5 stars for the Financial Ombudsman service, well done lads.
Tuesday, 27 August 2013
The Bromsford living RIP OFF.
In December last year me and my family moved in to a Bromford living house, after private renting for 10 years, we moved because our old house was damp and on a busy road, and with the building trade nearly dead we could no longer afford the rent the landlord wanted. They handed us the keys in November but we were already contracted to our old place until December, "not a problem" a Bromford living adviser told us, "back date the housing benefit and they will cover you on two houses for the month you move", this turned out to be bad advice as back dating the housing benefit was not allowed, meaning we are in £450 debt before we even move in.
We was happy with the new house and we had no complaints about Bromford living at all, we agreed to pay back the £450 that the benefits would not cover, there were no problems at all, other than dodgy plumbing left before we moved in caused a leak, ruining a new carpet that we had just paid £200 for.
We kept up payments for a few months until the week my girlfriend was in hospital having a baby, that week we did not pay, we had not even got home when the phone rang, it someone from Bromford living chasing a £30 payment, they can hear the baby screaming in the back of the car, my girlfriend is to polite but they insist on talking right there and then, I snatch the phone from my girlfriend and say "Stop harassing us" and hang up.
Two days later we get a letter threatening extra charges of £150 or eviction if they do not receive the payment, and all this over £30! they still received their rent. They come around our house every 3 months ticking boxes and looking around, they give us a red warning if we residents are very naughty and they want us out, amber if we residents are sometimes naughty but sometimes good and a green if we are really good, what next? Well done stickers and naughty corners? For the record we are on amber due to the £450 arrears that was added before we moved in.
Since moving in to our Bromford living house we have had nothing but problems with them so many problems I made a list.
1. Poor plumbing done before we moved in caused a huge leak ruining a brand new floor.
2. Bromford living advisers do not want to talk about replacing the floor or paying us damages, instead they would rather talk about useless work programs.
3. Bad advice from a Bromford living representative lead to us being in debt before we even moved in.
4. They threaten court action and eviction because we owed the £30
5. They tell us to contact them but their 0330 costs ridiculous amounts to ring on my mobile phone, in fact one call to a "free" number (not Bromford) cost me £15 pound!
So I give Bromford a red warning, threatening to make families homeless over £30 shows the greed of Bromford living and other housing associations around the UK.
We was happy with the new house and we had no complaints about Bromford living at all, we agreed to pay back the £450 that the benefits would not cover, there were no problems at all, other than dodgy plumbing left before we moved in caused a leak, ruining a new carpet that we had just paid £200 for.
We kept up payments for a few months until the week my girlfriend was in hospital having a baby, that week we did not pay, we had not even got home when the phone rang, it someone from Bromford living chasing a £30 payment, they can hear the baby screaming in the back of the car, my girlfriend is to polite but they insist on talking right there and then, I snatch the phone from my girlfriend and say "Stop harassing us" and hang up.
Two days later we get a letter threatening extra charges of £150 or eviction if they do not receive the payment, and all this over £30! they still received their rent. They come around our house every 3 months ticking boxes and looking around, they give us a red warning if we residents are very naughty and they want us out, amber if we residents are sometimes naughty but sometimes good and a green if we are really good, what next? Well done stickers and naughty corners? For the record we are on amber due to the £450 arrears that was added before we moved in.
Since moving in to our Bromford living house we have had nothing but problems with them so many problems I made a list.
1. Poor plumbing done before we moved in caused a huge leak ruining a brand new floor.
2. Bromford living advisers do not want to talk about replacing the floor or paying us damages, instead they would rather talk about useless work programs.
3. Bad advice from a Bromford living representative lead to us being in debt before we even moved in.
4. They threaten court action and eviction because we owed the £30
5. They tell us to contact them but their 0330 costs ridiculous amounts to ring on my mobile phone, in fact one call to a "free" number (not Bromford) cost me £15 pound!
So I give Bromford a red warning, threatening to make families homeless over £30 shows the greed of Bromford living and other housing associations around the UK.
St. Judes school in WOLVERHAMPTON is a JOKE.
St Judes primary school in Wolverhampton is rated by Ofsted as among the worst schools in Wolverhampton, and Wolverhampton is rated as one of the worst areas for education in the whole of Britain, meaning St Judes is obviously a bad school, I think I know what the problem is with St Judes and many other schools in Britain.
My children attended this school for years and in the time they spent there I heard MANY shocking complaints and stories from parents of the children that attended the school. My own children were checked over by teachers for cuts and bruises, after they discovered a rash on her arm, buts that's nothing, after discovering bruises on my child's friend, the delusional mental head mistress immediately contacted social services because kids never fall over, do they? you stupid lunatic, the head mistress of St Judes should concentrate on the schools poor performance in the national league tables before telling tales on parents.
Another parent I know of had her children taken off her for three months after bruises were discovered on his hip by the demon head mistress who again contacted social services, I hear the children are now back home after three months away from their family.
To be fair to the head mistress the school was in a state before she got there, they once sent me a letter out threatening to throw my children out the school because I told them we had booked a holiday that would mean the kids would have to have TWO days off school, what a terrible parent I must be.
At the end of this term the school arranged a trip for school leavers to the safari park, how kind of them, however the teachers use this trip as an excuse to blackmail children in to attending a fund raising carnival, the children were told if they do not attend the carnival they may not be allowed to go to the safari park or the prom! WHY ARE St JUDES SCHOOL HAVING PROMS FOR 11 YEAR OLDS ANYWAY? My other child was told that a school trip to Wales was compulsory! but they still wanted money for it, unfortunately for them they did not get it.
The dinners at the school are expensive, unhealthy,disgusting and according to my children and my children's friends "sometimes full of hair"
At home time the school have police and traffic wardens all over the place, cashing in on the terrible parking arrangements at the school.
My advice is AVOID ST JUDES AT ALL COST.
My children attended this school for years and in the time they spent there I heard MANY shocking complaints and stories from parents of the children that attended the school. My own children were checked over by teachers for cuts and bruises, after they discovered a rash on her arm, buts that's nothing, after discovering bruises on my child's friend, the delusional mental head mistress immediately contacted social services because kids never fall over, do they? you stupid lunatic, the head mistress of St Judes should concentrate on the schools poor performance in the national league tables before telling tales on parents.
Another parent I know of had her children taken off her for three months after bruises were discovered on his hip by the demon head mistress who again contacted social services, I hear the children are now back home after three months away from their family.
To be fair to the head mistress the school was in a state before she got there, they once sent me a letter out threatening to throw my children out the school because I told them we had booked a holiday that would mean the kids would have to have TWO days off school, what a terrible parent I must be.
At the end of this term the school arranged a trip for school leavers to the safari park, how kind of them, however the teachers use this trip as an excuse to blackmail children in to attending a fund raising carnival, the children were told if they do not attend the carnival they may not be allowed to go to the safari park or the prom! WHY ARE St JUDES SCHOOL HAVING PROMS FOR 11 YEAR OLDS ANYWAY? My other child was told that a school trip to Wales was compulsory! but they still wanted money for it, unfortunately for them they did not get it.
The dinners at the school are expensive, unhealthy,disgusting and according to my children and my children's friends "sometimes full of hair"
At home time the school have police and traffic wardens all over the place, cashing in on the terrible parking arrangements at the school.
My advice is AVOID ST JUDES AT ALL COST.
Monday, 26 August 2013
I make money for billionaire CORPORATIONS and not for my family!
Did you know that every time someone watches my youtube videos huge multinational corporations get paid, and I do not, why? because huge billionaire, multinational and greedy corporations like Sony, use false copyright claims on public domain material, like classical music that is hundreds of years old, after making the copyright claim Sony and Google are then allowed to advertise on the video and cash in from videos they have not legal right to! Youtube advertise on nearly all of my feature length videos despite the fact they have no permission from me, if I use modern day copyright protected music that they own the rights to they have every legal right to do this, but Sony are not happy with having nearly complete control of modern day music, Sony are so greedy they want money from songs written in the 18th and 19th centuries.
My answer to this was try uploading on different websites videoweed, videobb and blip TV all owed me royalties Blip TV (owned by huge multinational corporations Canaan Partners and Bain Capital Ventures) owe me over £500 but they all removed my videos, closed my accounts and refused to pay! Youtube refuse to let me upload videos over 15 minutes for 2 years, then a few weeks ago they suddenly change their minds and enable my account to upload long videos, only to change their minds again a couple of months later.
FAIR USE LAW USA.
Not with standing the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
Fair use is another law these greedy corporations completely ignore, e.g if I use a clip from CNN, Walt Disney or BBC to explain my criticism of them, that does NOT allow them to claim ownership or even part ownership of my video, but these corporations are thirsty for money like a crack head is thirsty for crack and the corporations simply put in false copyright claims and because of these false copyright claims they cash in from videos that are in some cases criticizing them!
There █████ █ ████ is ███ █ no █████ █ ████ conspiracy █ █████████ █ ████ everything ███ █████ is█████ ████ ████ fine ████ ███ ██████ trust ███ ██████ ███ your █████ ████ government.
Youtube █████ ███ █ is █████████ █ ██████ ███ a brilliant ████ ███ ██████ ███ website █████ ████ and ████ ███ ██████ Youtube █████ ████ believes in █████ █ ████ ███ freedom of speech. ███ Youtube!
My answer to this was try uploading on different websites videoweed, videobb and blip TV all owed me royalties Blip TV (owned by huge multinational corporations Canaan Partners and Bain Capital Ventures) owe me over £500 but they all removed my videos, closed my accounts and refused to pay! Youtube refuse to let me upload videos over 15 minutes for 2 years, then a few weeks ago they suddenly change their minds and enable my account to upload long videos, only to change their minds again a couple of months later.
FAIR USE LAW USA.
Not with standing the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantial of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Fair use is another law these greedy corporations completely ignore, e.g if I use a clip from CNN, Walt Disney or BBC to explain my criticism of them, that does NOT allow them to claim ownership or even part ownership of my video, but these corporations are thirsty for money like a crack head is thirsty for crack and the corporations simply put in false copyright claims and because of these false copyright claims they cash in from videos that are in some cases criticizing them!
There █████ █ ████ is ███ █ no █████ █ ████ conspiracy █ █████████ █ ████ everything ███ █████ is█████ ████ ████ fine ████ ███ ██████ trust ███ ██████ ███ your █████ ████ government.
Youtube █████ ███ █ is █████████ █ ██████ ███ a brilliant ████ ███ ██████ ███ website █████ ████ and ████ ███ ██████ Youtube █████ ████ believes in █████ █ ████ ███ freedom of speech. ███ Youtube!
Sunday, 25 August 2013
THE KING OF HYPOCRISY?
Britain is to challenge an EU agreement to slash bankers’ bonuses at a meeting of European finance ministers next week after Boris Johnson condemned the proposal as a “deluded measure”. George Osborne or the Treasury minister Greg Clark will represent Britain at the meeting next week to relay what No 10 described as real concerns about the proposal. David Cameron and the British government have cut incapacity benefit, the NHS, housing benefits and child benefits but they stand against a cap on banker bonuses, do they think the bankers deserve to get these ridiculous bonuses when they are cutting sickness benefits? Britain’s Deficit is not so important now the bankers (David Cameron’s puppet masters) might lose out as well.
David Cameron is so full of hypocrisy its shocking here are just a few examples;
“Things got out of hand & we’d had a few drinks. We smashed the place up and Boris set fire to the toilets.”
- David Cameron, 1986.
“The looting and arson last night were criminality, pure and simple. Justice will be done and the people will see the consequences for their crimes”
- David Cameron, August 2011
“History is sweeping through your neighbourhood” -David Cameron on the Egyptian riots, February 2011
DAVID Cameron was later accused of cynically using the Egyptian revolution as cover for an arms dealing tour of the Middle East.
He has a business delegation that includes eight firms involved in the arms trade.
BAE Systems, Thales UK, Atkins, Rolls-Royce, Cobham Group, Qinetiq, Babcock International Group and Ultra Electronics are all looking to make lucrative deals.
But Sarah Waldron, of the Campaign Against the Arms Trade, said that it “beggared belief” that Mr Cameron was helping sell arms to the region despite bloodshed in Libya.
David Cameron goes on T.V and condemn’s Jimmy Carr for tax avoidance, he did not mention the massive tax avoidance of his friends at News corporation, Tesco, Vodafone.
David Cameron cuts housing benefits, sickness benefits and forces people on benefits to work for billionaire corporations just to receive benefits, at the same time he claims £21000 per year for his second home! These greedy politicians always claim they must have a second home for work reasons but can’t they just move closer to where they are working? like the rest of us would have to, thanks to the new bedroom tax MPs are allowed spare houses, but we are not allowed spare bedrooms!
When the British government cut benefits from parents of the poorest families and force them from there homes, stop there benefits and even lock them up for not paying council tax, its the children of the affected families that suffer the most. Should children of the poorest families in Britain suffer to fund corporate tax avoidance and oil wars?
David Cameron praised the courts and encouraged tough sentences for the people involved in the rioting and looting but claims thousands on his expenses “which are paid for by the taxpayer” illegally he did not receive a tough punishment he simply paid it back!
David Cameron declares a ”all-out war” on gangs, despite being a member of Bullingdon club (a gang known for heavy drinking and causing criminal damage) as was Boris Johnson and George Osborne.
David Cameron cuts the NHS but does not want to cut banker bonuses! He wants a £26000 per year cap on benefits but refuses to put a cap on MPs expenses and tries to stop the EU fro enforcing a cap on banker bonuses! He uses the British media as a propaganda tool but still can not win an election without Nick “the traitor” Clegg.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)